News articles on pakistan dating october12 f secure not updating

See also: One-page summary of key findings of this dispute Consultations Complaint by India, Malaysia, Pakistan and Thailand.On 8 October 1996, India, Malaysia, Pakistan and Thailand requested consultations with the United States concerning a ban on importation of shrimp and shrimp products from these complainants imposed by the US under Section 609 of US Public Law 101-162.

news articles on pakistan dating october12-59

Implementation of adopted reports At the DSB meeting on the adoption of the Appellate Body report and the compliance panel report, as upheld by the Appellate Body on 21 November 2001, the United States stated that was pleased that both the Article 21.5 panel and the Appellate Body had found that the United States had implemented the DSB's recommendations and rulings insofar as it had found that the US compliance measure was justified as a conservation measure under Article XX(g) of the GATT 1994 and that the United States had rectified the prior measure's discriminatory aspects.

Mohammad Nawaz started out in cricket at the age of 14 as a left-arm medium-fast bowler and a middle-order batsman.

At its meeting of 23 October 2000, the DSB referred the matter to the original panel pursuant to Article 21.5 DSU.

Australia, Canada, the European Communities, Ecuador, India, Japan, Mexico, Pakistan, Thailand and Hong Kong, China reserved their third-party rights.

On 8 November 2000, the compliance panel was composed.

The compliance panel circulated its report on 15 June 2001.On 19 September 2001, the Chairman of the Appellate Body informed the DSB that it would not be able to circulate its report within 60 days.It was estimated that the Appellate Body report would be circulated no later than 22 October 2001.Compliance proceedings On the grounds that the United States had not implemented appropriately the recommendations of the DSB, on 12 October 2000, Malaysia requested that the matter be referred to the original panel pursuant to Article 21.5 of the DSU.In particular, Malaysia considered that by not lifting the import prohibition and not taking the necessary measures to allow the importation of certain shrimp and shrimp products in an unrestrictive manner, the United States had failed to comply with the recommendations and rulings of the DSB.The Appellate Body reversed the panel’s finding that the US measure at issue is not within the scope of measures permitted under the chapeau of Article XX of the GATT 1994, but concluded that the US measure, while qualifying for provisional justification under Article XX(g), fails to meet the requirements of the chapeau of Article XX.

Tags: , ,