jessi dan dating - Sm nd dating method
potassium-argon (K-Ar) “ages” calculated for each of the 27 amphibolite samples from Grand Canyon ranged from 405.1 ± 10 Ma (million years) to 2,574.2 ± 73 Ma.That is a six-fold difference, for samples that should be of similar age.
They point to a catastrophic origin for granites, consistent with the biblical timeframe for earth history and God’s judgment during the Flood.
The radioisotope methods, long touted as irrefutably dating the earth as countless millions of years old, have repeatedly failed to give reliable and meaningful absolute ages for Grand Canyon rocks.
This means that the laboratory testing was precise.
However, as the results show, the error estimates say nothing about the accuracy of the “ages” of the rock samples.
Most people think that radioactive dating has proven the earth is billions of years old.
After all, textbooks, media, and museums glibly present ages of millions of years as fact.
Furthermore, the ages calculated for these Grand Canyon rocks using three “isochron” methods also disagreed greatly with each other.
Even when the error margins are taken into account, the three different dating methods give completely different “ages” that cannot be explained away.
Based on radiometric dating, long-age geologists say that the basalt lavas erupted 1,745 million years ago4 and were metamorphosed some 1,700 million years ago.5 Many people, including many scientists, accept these dates as absolute truth.
They believe that when different radio-dating methods are used on the same rocks, they will all yield the same age.
These were once flows of basalt lava, up to tens of metres thick (figure 4).Tags: Adult Dating, affair dating, sex dating